Showing posts with label Age-gap. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Age-gap. Show all posts

Friday, 10 February 2023

Seasonal Quartet - Ali Smith

Ali Smith's Four Seasons. Writing through time, real and… | by James  Mustich | Curious | Medium 

Funnily enough, the Southwark electronic library has a e-copy of the first two books of the series, but I had to go to the actual library (exotic!) to get the hard copies of the last two. 

With hindsight, that was somewhat fitting, as I fell in love with Autumn and Winter, thinking of ways to write to Ali Smith to tell her how impressed I was with her decision to tackle events "in real time", take such a clear stand on so many social issues, and express (yet again) her love for Italy and Italian culture. 

Said love started to subside by Spring, and ultimately Summer left me rather unsatisfied. Much like had happened with Jonathan Coe's Middle England I felt that Smith couldn't quite manage to finish with a "bang" so, to avoid finishing with a "thud", she decided to finish with something that is safe and whose vibe (though - in her defense - not its details) is largely predictable. 

Also, that should teach me about reading four books from the same author in quick succession. I had grown tired of her writing style by the end, and I really wish that hadn't happened.

Tuesday, 1 August 2017

Summer Book – Tove Jansson


A book that I’ve bought (again at the Blackheath Book Sale!) because my former English teacher recommended it to me.

The good things I can say of this are: it’s cute, it’s an easy and relaxing summer read, it reminded me of Pippi Longstocking, and it’s so much better than the Winter Book (then again, hardly the literary accomplishment of a lifetime).

And there are ultimately no bad things I can say about this book, other than the fact that it’s “cute” (which I earlier listed as a positive, but it’s undeniably also a big limitation) and that I really wish it had some sort of development rather than being ultimately a collection of free-standing short-stories. Or, yet again, maybe I’m just not deep and poetic (or, crucially in this case, a woman – as I believe a book like this appeals more to a female audience).

But one thing did blow my mind: back in the day those extremely sweet characters who lived in close contact with nature found it perfectly ok to dump their rubbish in the sea. Oh the times they-are-a-changing (very rightfully!)…

Monday, 5 December 2016

About a Boy - Nick Hornby

Not even 50p. This was actually 30p from the Barbican Library overstock shelves. Now, I do realize that, much like David Nicholls a decade later, Nick Hornby isn’t exactly great literature, but it’s very well written and funny, and its cultural pop references are still better than those of plenty of bestsellers. So go ahead, and look down on me for enjoying a read like this every once in a while.

For once I actually had a book that I could pick-up on a short train journey (not that I use trains often – I just happened to do a bit of parkrun tourism when I was reading About a Boy), while waiting in line at the post office and, erm, on the toilet.

And it was great.

Having watched the movie, most of the gags and jokes were unsurprising (that said, I did still giggle aloud a few times – the dead duck remains priceless) but the ending was much more meaningful than I expected (not that seeing Hugh Grant accompany Marcus’s version of Killing Me Softly isn’t meaningful). And reading about my old neighbourhood always makes me feel all warm inside.

So yeah – Great literature? Not even remotely. Great read? Absolutely. 

Wednesday, 23 September 2015

Lolita – Vladimir Nabokov



I read the book after watching Kubrick’s film. I really enjoyed the movie, and I wasn’t really that disturbed by Humbert’s attraction for a 16-year old(ish) Lolita, but hell, in the book she’s twelve!

Many consider this an erotic novel, but it’s actually so much more than that and it upsets me to see it considered as such (supposed masterpieces of world literature like Lady Chatterley’s Lover, on the other hand, can be considered just erotic novels for me). The biggest quality of the book, I believe, is that Humbert (unlike Quilty) is actually likeable. Sure, every reader has to condemn his actions, but I am sure that most wanted him to sort out his issues and live happily ever after with a girl aged 18 or more.

And this may be a silly point, but I think that the fact that in the book Humbert is the only one addressing Dolores as “Lolita” gives the entire novel a slightly different spin.