Heart of a Dog - Mikhail Bulgakov

 

A neighbour left a whole bunch of novels by some of my favourite authors in a box on a doorstep. When I saw it I was running back home. I stopped. I dove into the box. And I came out with this novel, a bunch of books by Coetzee, some by Eugenides, some 19th century classics, and had a good backpack full of books (needless to say, that last 1 km back home was a tad bit slower than the previous ones...). 

Only thing: in my oxygen-deprived state my mind swapped Bulgakov and Nabokov (I can't be the first one, though that's no excuse). I had found The Master and Margarita to be ponderous and self-indulgent, but having got this book anyway I decided to read it (also because, in all honesty, it's very short...). 

Turns out, I don't particularly like dogs, I don't particularly like Bulgakov, and I don't particularly like mad doctors playing god with brain transplants. I also don't particularly like allegoric depictions of the Soviet Union characterized by a sense of humour that was probably dated already in the 1920s. 

So, guess what, I didn't particularly like this book...

The Brothers Karamazov – Fyodor Dostoevsky

And finally here we are, the book that stayed with me for pretty much a month! In the words of Coldplay “Nobody said it was easy”, but it was in the end so very worth it. I honestly thought this was going to be one of those books that I would read just for the sake of saying that I have done so, but I was wrong.

The Brothers Karamazov ended up being way less philosophical than what I was fearing and just plain enjoyable – every single character is interesting, deep, and troubled in his/her own way and the fact that some of their ideas and feelings remain hidden for hundreds of pages adds to the interest of the novel. Well, I said every single character is interesting, but I actually meant “almost every single character” as I found Alyosha to be simply too saintly (even more so than his own spiritual father).

Maybe I’m just reading too much into it, but since there is a break in the narrative as Karamazov Sr gets killed (sorry for the spoiler, but also my own Wordsworth Classics edition mentioned the event on its back-cover!) are we sure that Dimitri is ultimately innocent and that Smerdyakov did the deed? I mean, can we really trust Smerdyakov’s own confession? Possibly I’m the one who’s being too philosophical now…

And again, speaking of me reading a bit too much into it, I actually wonder whether the fairly open finale means that Dostoevsky actually thought that at some point he might write something on the lives of the Karamazovs and their women after Dimitri’s “departure”. 

The Idiot – Fyodor Dostoevsky

One of the “big” books that I wanted to read during my wife and daughter’s prolonged stay in Brazil. I succeeded, but at times it was honestly quite hard.

The Idiot started off as possibly my favourite Dostoevsky novel, mostly because Lev is such a wonderful character (or maybe I’m biased and he’s actually just a 19^th century Russian version of Forrest Gump?), but after Part I the book just goes on and on a bit too much, and I actually often struggled to keep track of who the characters were (Aglaya and Nastasia in particular merged into one at multiple points).

It’s undeniably my fault to a very large extent – I should have put a more serious effort in reading the book instead of going through most of it during lulls at work (shh…) – but, for want of a better term, after 200 pages I just started to find the book a bit boring. And after dismissing a Dostoevsky novel with a banal word like “boring”, I have officially lost every credibility as a reader/blogger/pseudo-intellectual/human being…

The Gambler (and other stories) – Fyodor Dostoevsky

When it comes to buying me books I have fundamentally four categories of friends (from the largest to the smallest): those who don’t even try because they are too scared (I feel your pain, and I apologize for being a snob!), those who try to buy me books and fail miserably, those who ask me what books I want or directly give me book vouchers (always very much appreciated), and those who just buy me books and don’t fail miserably (I salute you). This collection of stories comes from a friend belonging to the last category.

Some of the short stories in the collection I found quite boring (White Nights above all, despite being one of the most well-known works in this book), but others I found absolutely brilliant: A Nasty Story and The Meek One in particular not only don’t show any sign of ageing, but they are also so incredibly touching (I feel no sympathy for the protagonist of the former, and not that much for that of the latter, but plenty of sympathy for the celebrating family and the wife and servant respectively).

The Gambler itself is a wonderful novel(la?) about human weakness – when Dostoevsky describes the main character’s “system” it appears quite clearly that his own system mustn’t have been too different. The one issue I found, however, is that after the bombshell of grandmother’s arrival and her subsequent departure the pace of the novel slowed down too much and I lost a fair bit of interest, regained only in the last few pages with the summary of everyone’s lives given by Astley. So yeah, they probably should have kept on gambling instead of leaving Roulettenburg!!

Taras Bulba – Nicolaj Gogol

I had to read some Gogol at some point. But seriously, what the hell?

Sure, I’m not Russian so I can’t understand, but I’m normally all up for epic stories of national courage (even Russian courage, in the case of Michael Strogoff…) but isn’t Taras Bulba (not written in italics because I’m referring to the character and not to the novel) a bit much?

Sure, your son has switched sides (a bit too easily also), but killing him in battle without feeling at least a wee bit emotional sounds, well, heartless. At a certain point even his comrades tell Taras that he might want to take it down a notch but he continues to be an almost perfect killing machine.

One would hope that at least while he’s being burned he would stop. But he doesn’t. He keeps on yelling at his Cossacks. A true leader. And possibly an idiot. 

Crime and Punishment - Fyodor Dostoevsky

I figured my best chance of reading (and understanding) Crime and Punishment was to power through it over the long Easter weekend. I thought my mind was going to be blown away. Much to my surprise, it wasn't. 

The problem was that I didn't care about what happened to Raskolnikov. He could turn himself in, he could be found, he could run away - it just didn't matter to me. His mental lapses, his guilt (or lack thereof), his rants left me rather unmoved. And - to make matters worse - I also kept on thinking about Martin Cruz Smith's Arkady Renko (yes, I know I'm linking one of the universally recognized greatest novels ever written to a 1980s trashy - but oh so good - best-seller!) and his comments about the triviality of Russian murders... And the epilogue - with the promised redemption - upset me a fair bit with its cheesiness. 

The only moments in which I actually liked Raskolnikov where the ones in which he came to the realization that he is not a Übermensch (where he appeared not just like a human being, but like one who might deserve some sympathy). And I felt that my favourite character - Svidrigailov - was not given the attention (and the space) he deserved - his story was the one that deserved to be told in minute detail, in my humble opinion...

The Master and Margarita – Mikhail Bulgakov

The unfortunately high expectations that I had from this book probably ruined it for me. I though my mind was going to be blown away by Bulgakov’s masterpiece, instead I was left extremely disappointed. I remember a school re-enactment of the first chapter of the novel, with the mysterious Iraqi kid playing a great Woland, but as it turns out that was, for me, by far the most interesting chapter in the entire novel. My father loved the book, but maybe it was a generational thing.

As I mentioned before, I already have issues with magical realism, but works of fantasy are just too much for me. After a couple of hundred pages the book just got boring for me. The intentions of the devilish characters are generally quite foreseeable from the start, so just get on with it. And I was hoping for at least something more satanic (and not just plain decadent) for the ball.

After a while even Behemoth, the most entertaining of Woland’s gang, becomes boring and repetitive. And the sections on the Master’s book seem just like a long, bleak return to Sunday school.

Doctor Zhivago – Boris Pasternak

Zhivago’s wife, Tonya, might be the most interesting character in this lengthy novel. Too bad she is barely present. What is the difference between this masterwork of 20^th century literature and Rosamund Pilcher’s books? As far as I know, the only ones are that Pasternak’s book is set in Soviet Russia and that it criticizes the Soviet system. This is praiseworthy, surely, but is it enough to justify the book’s popularity? I’m not quite sure, although it definitely should be enough to justify the view of Pasternak as a hero of the fight against totalitarianism.

I simply didn’t need those many pages of Zhivago’s pointless principles. An autobiography of Pasternak would have been a lot more interesting...

Demons – Fyodor Dostoevsky

A wonderful gift by a friend who, having to always have a different opinion from the rest of the world, told me that this should have been my first Dostoevsky book rather than Crime and Punishment, or The Idiot, or The Karamazov Brothers. 

It is clearly one of the best books I’ve ever read, although the fact that I've pretty much never read any other 19th century greats means I don't have much to compare it with. Nevertheless, it probably still needs more time to sink in, as my opinions and recollections fluctuate between awe for the incredibly insightful socio-political commentary, and slight boredom in the descriptive chapters at the start and the ones portraying the lives of either the rich or the poor people at the end of the second part and at the start of the third one

Most of all, I find it really perplexing that not a single one of the characters is actually likeable. Stavrogin is a spoiled little ass who only (barely) recovers towards the end with his suicide note, Stepan Trofimovich is just an intellectual loser (maybe I can relate, with my underutilized PhD and forgotten Cambridge MPhil?) and you just feel sorry for him but don't really like him, Pyotr Stepanovich is just downright scary, and Kirillov is by far the most fascinating character for me, but talk of creepy...